Small bird, bane of developers |
In part, this is a war between the “lumpers” and the “splitters.” Wikipedia notes that “was recently split from the similar Black-tailed Gnatcatcher of the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts,” and it’s clear that Zink and Barrowclough do not think the split was warranted. Zink’s classification of the bird is based on genetic studies, and he characterize the earlier studies as
based on qualitative judgments and early 1900s technology — basically the equivalent of calipers and pencils.Then there’s the developers. The status of the California gnatcatcher has stymied some attempts of development along the Southern California coast, as it would displace the coastal sage scrub where the bird lives. Obviously, the developers would like to see that protection ended, and they funded the research. Zink claims that it didn’t matter, saying of the California building industry that,
“Yes, they have a dog in this fight, but the university would not accept funding if the DNA study got money from sources they consider tainted,” he added. “They did not influence the research or writing of this study.”Or maybe they just knew where to shop around.
Mike Patten, a geneticist at the University of Oklahoma, argued that Zink is "philosophically opposed to the very nation of ‘subspecies’ and therefore should be recused from cases such as this one.Developers have now petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to remove the protections granted to the bird in 1993
Update: Meant to include the black-tailed gnatcatcher for the sake of comparison.
You can follow my blog on Twitter (@impofthediverse) or on Facebook. If you like this post, share it with your friends. If you have a comment just for me, e-mail me at impofthediverse@gmail.com.
This blog runs solely on ego! Follow this blog! Comment on this post! Let me know that you want to read more of it!
No comments:
Post a Comment