It was pointed out in a circular which was placed in the hands of all the delegates that one of the greatest obstacles to the police of the world acting as a unit in the detection and surveillance of criminals has always been, and is still the diversity of languages. These lawbreakers, it stated, profit by these difficulties and often escape because of the impossibility of promptly advising officers in all foreign countries to be on the lookout for them, and such would not be the case were there a common language.No surprise, really, that the document advocated the use of Esperanto. Alas, this seems to be a case of a solution desperately seeking a problem. Not that there aren't problems with language barriers that Esperanto would easily solve, just that this isn't one of them.
The pamphlet set forth the qualifications needed for this international language for police, which of course Esperanto easily fulfilled.
The petitioners stated in the communication that it would be impossible to give in detail the advantages of Esperanto (a language composed by Dr. L. Samenhof, of Warsaw, Russia), but it fulfilled all the conditions required.We all know that Esperanto did not become the international language of policing, and it was not a matter that the convention took up, no matter how positive a spin the article tried to put on it.
The convention took on action on the proposition on account of pressure of other business, but it is understood that the suggestion met with general approval.At the time of the convention, Esperanto was not yet 15 years old, and its own convention was still three years in the future.
Oh, and it's "haltu aŭ mi pafos!"
You can follow my blog on Twitter (@impofthediverse) or on Facebook. If you like this post, share it with your friends. If you have a comment just for me, e-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This blog runs solely on ego! Follow this blog! Comment on this post! Let me know that you want to read more of it!