You broke the law, but you seem to have paid in advance. |
On the other hand, the article does note that Belle Olcotte (who may or may not be Ida Beale Olcott) previously ran the “Stock Exchange,” which (given the location) was either a saloon or a place where livestock were traded. Either of those might actually be the occupation of the wife of a farmer. The article suggests that she had another occupation, “conducting a bawdy house.”
There’s no further detail to be found:
Belle Olcott, former proprietor of the Stock Exchange and who was arrested on a warrant of conducting a bawdy house, drew a not true bill. Though the grand jury does not offer any explanation in support of its bills, it is understood the jurors took the stand that in conducting a bawdy house, the accused had done so with the consent of the city authorities and had paid a monthly sum into the city treasurer for the privilege.That’s all that’s said.
The grand jury seems to have decided that it was clear that Olcott was running a bawdy house (typically a house of prostitution, though sometimes referring to a place which supplied alcohol and beds, where patrons had to bring their own women, sort of like a combination bar and hourly-rate motel), but she had permission, and she had paid for that. So, reason to take this case to court.
I don’t know what the Oregon statutes were in 1913, but it’s clear that if you were going to run a bawdy house at that time, you’d better check with the city authorities first, and always make certain that the city treasury gets its cut.
No comments:
Post a Comment